Add stabilization capacity without hiring.
A product live, revenue coming in, real customers, but a small engineering team already stretched thin on the roadmap.
02 · Small SaaS teams · 1–5 devs
Keep your developers on the roadmap. Grace secures and maintains the product in the background.
What you're living with
- The product runs, but technical debt keeps piling up
- One security vulnerability, and it's an incident on a Sunday night
- Every fix pulls the team off the roadmap
What Grace changes
- Stabilization capacity without hiring
- Vulnerabilities fixed before they turn into incidents
- Your devs stay focused on what grows the product
- Every change ships as a tested PR, with no regressions
What the five deliverables look like for you.
The method doesn't change from one customer to the next. What it produces does.
- 01Mapping
A map of what the product actually is today, not what the architecture doc said two years ago.
- 02Safety net
Coverage placed where churn is highest and where the revenue passes, before anything gets touched.
- 03Stabilization
The security and stability backlog worked down in the background, one reviewable PR at a time.
- 04Memory
Why a trade-off was made, kept next to the code, so the next hire doesn't have to guess.
- 05Maintenance
New advisories and new features both arrive the same way: a tested PR with an impact simulation.
What you'll actually use.
Grace does the same five things for everyone. These are the ones that matter most in your situation.
GitHub push & PR monitoring, as it happens
Tested, reversible pull requests
Impact simulation before anything lands
Dependency advisories arriving as patches
The memory works for you here.
“Your roadmap moves, the team changes, priorities shift. Grace's memory holds the thread of every decision taken on your codebase, so none of it is lost.”
Every intervention adds to a record tied to your repo: the decision, the assumption behind it, the risk that was ruled out. It's the part of the work that usually lives in someone's head, and leaves when they do.
What people in your position ask first.
Something else on your mind? Write to us.
It adds review, not meetings. A Grace PR arrives already tested, with the diff, the impact simulation, and the rationale in the description. Reviewing one is closer to reading a summary than to doing the work yourself, and you can decline it in one click.
Those tell you something changed or something looks wrong. Grace traces a finding to the cause in your code, writes the fix, tests it against the paths that carry your revenue, and shows you the before/after. A bumped version number isn't a fix if the call site still breaks.
The advisory reaches Grace through the repo, and the corrective PR is waiting when someone looks. Nothing merges without a human, so the worst case is that you read it Monday instead of being paged to write it Sunday.
Start with the audit. It costs nothing.
Connect the repo and see the risks ranked, in minutes. You decide what happens next.
Not quite your situation?