Turn post-project support into profitable recurring revenue.
You ship MVPs built with AI and you have to maintain them, often several client apps at once. Support eats the margin it was supposed to protect.
01 · Agencies & studios
Stop absorbing post-project support. Hand over stabilized apps, and turn maintenance into margin.
What you're living with
- Post-project support eats your margin without being billed
- Several client apps, no consolidated view of their health
- One bug at a client pulls the whole team into a fire drill
What Grace changes
- Support becomes a recurring, profitable subscription
- One workspace per client, credits pooled at the account level
- Clear deliverables (map, risks, before/after) to show the client
- Stabilization runs in the background, without tying up your devs
What the five deliverables look like for you.
The method doesn't change from one customer to the next. What it produces does.
- 01Mapping
An inventory per client app, so you find out which one is a liability before the client does.
- 02Safety net
Tests first on the flows the client would notice going down: checkout, login, whatever the app exists to do.
- 03Stabilization
Critical fixes arrive as PRs your devs approve in minutes instead of losing an afternoon to.
- 04Memory
The reasoning behind each client's app, kept somewhere other than one developer's head.
- 05Maintenance
A report per client, per period, that justifies the retainer without anyone writing it.
What you'll actually use.
Grace does the same five things for everyone. These are the ones that matter most in your situation.
One workspace per client, all under one account
Reports you can forward to the client as-is
Automatic PRs on your clients' Sentry errors
Credits pooled across the whole portfolio
The memory works for you here.
“When the developer who built your client's app leaves the studio, the memory stays. Grace recorded all of it.”
Every intervention adds to a record tied to your repo: the decision, the assumption behind it, the risk that was ruled out. It's the part of the work that usually lives in someone's head, and leaves when they do.
What people in your position ask first.
Something else on your mind? Write to us.
Most agencies do. Plans are priced per portfolio, not per client, so the gap between what you pay and what you charge for a maintenance retainer is yours. The periodic report is the deliverable that makes the retainer easy to justify.
No. Everything sits under your account, one workspace per client, with credits pooled across all of them so a quiet app subsidises a noisy one. You decide what gets forwarded to whom.
That's the normal case. Grace starts from the repo, not from documentation. The mapping step exists precisely because nobody wrote any.
Start with the audit. It costs nothing.
Connect the repo and see the risks ranked, in minutes. You decide what happens next.
Not quite your situation?